Ocean Races, Swiss Cheese and Dinos

If you’ve ever trusted the plotter “because it’s always right,” this story is for you. Not as a scare tactic - as a reminder that the sea punishes one thing above all: unchallenged assumptions.

Nautical chart showing the Cargados Carajos shoals (Saint Brandon) and surrounding reefs
Screenshot

In an old children’s fable, the Dinos were so massive that they failed to notice the puddles beneath their feet. They stepped in them, caught a cold and died out. Just like that, the giants were gone.

In November 2014, the sailing world stood still in disbelief. The yacht Team Vestas Wind, competing in the Volvo Ocean Race, struck the Cargados Carajos Shoals in the Indian Ocean at a staggering 16 knots.

Cargados Carajos is not a solitary rock or an uncharted island. It is a shallow archipelago the size of a major city – nearly 30 miles long and 12 miles wide, well-documented and marked on every maritime chart. How did a crew of the world’s best sailors, led by a seasoned skipper, commit such a “rookie” mistake?

The answer lies in psychology, the mathematics of digital charts and the “Swiss Cheese” model.

The crash occurred during Leg 2 of the race, en route from Cape Town to Abu Dhabi. The crew had not yet endured the grueling storms of the Southern Ocean, which typically deplete a sailor’s strength by the end of the circumnavigation. Skipper Chris Nicholson and navigator Wouter Verbraak were in fair physical condition. So this wasn’t a failure born of exhaustion; it was a systemic collapse.

The Cheese holes

To understand the causes of the disaster, experts looked to the model proposed by Professor James Reason. He argued that no accident happens for a single reason. Safety is like a stack of Swiss cheese slices. Each slice is a protective barrier. And each slice has holes. A catastrophe only occurs when the holes in every layer – from software to human judgment – align to create a direct path for disaster.

The Dino Case

The navigator of Team Vestas – Wouter Verbraak – a highly technical and experienced navigator – fell victim to a quirk in C-Map vector charts:

At a small scale, the reef simply did not appear on the screen.

At a medium scale, it looked like a safe zone with depths of 40-80 meters.

Only at maximum zoom did the landmasses “pop up” with the warning: “Breaking water.”

Verbraak checked the route, but he didn’t zoom in to the highest level at every single point across the open ocean. The software algorithm “collapsed” the danger to declutter the screen, and that became the first hole in the cheese.

Cognitive Hypnosis

Chris Nicholson – the skipper of Team Vestas – was on watch at the moment of impact. Why didn’t a captain with such colossal experience sense something was wrong? This was Automation Complacency.

When GPS shows your position with centimeter-precision for years, the brain stops questioning the monitor. The crew saw the water depth changing and white foam on the horizon, but cognitive bias forced them to interpret it as “just ocean swell.” After all, the instrument insisted there were 40 meters of clear water beneath the keel. The captain was on deck, focused and experienced, but he was “blinded” by digital certainty.

In search for remedy

The wreckage of Team Vestas Wind serves as a stark reminder that the more advanced our tools become, the more deliberate we must be in our defense. To stop the holes in the Swiss cheese from aligning, we must consciously add layers back into our seamanship.

Reinforce the Layers

Safety is not a single device; it is a redundancy of thought. If the digital chart is one layer, the depth sounder is the second, and visual observation is the third. When these layers provide conflicting data – such as seeing “breaking water” while the screen shows 40 meters – good seamanship demands we trust the most primitive layer first.

Marry the New with the Old

Modern technology is a gift, but it shouldn’t replace the “feel” of the sea. Integrating “old school” methods like Dead Reckoning and paper-chart oversight creates a mental model of the journey that a glowing screen cannot provide. By manually plotting a course, the navigator engages with the geography on a granular level, making it much harder for a 40-mile archipelago to simply “disappear.”

Master the Trade-offs

To truly use modern technology, we should understand its architecture, how it works, what advantages it brings and what limitations it inevitably carries.

Fair winds!

Share this article

Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *